Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Jan 22;506(7487):179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12929

Table 3. Enrichment of de novo mutations in postsynaptic protein complexes.

Statistical significance for enrichment of de novo mutations in glutamatergic postsynaptic gene sets20. Nominally significant p-values (<0.05), as calculated by dnenrich (see Supplementary Text), are marked in bold. # mut = mutation counts in each set. O/E = observed-to-expected ratio of mutational hits (fold-enrichment statistic) calculated by dnenrich. Samples and classes of mutations are as Table 2. Total numbers of mutations for each class in each sample are given in parentheses. Additional details for the current study, including genes and 95% credible intervals (CI) for the O/E statistics, are given in Extended Data Figure 4.

Current study Schizophrenia (ref. 14) Schizophrenia (ref. 13) Schizophrenia all (refs 1214) Autism spectrum disorder6-9 Intellectual disability10,11
Nonsynonymous (482) Loss-of-function (64) Nonsynonymous (68) Loss-of-function (12) Nonsynonymous (137) LoF (20) Nonsynonymous (702) Loss-of-function (100) Nonsynonymous (789) Loss-of-function (134) Nonsynonymous (141) Loss-of-function (34)

Gene set genes (N) P No. mut. O/E P # mut O/E P P P P P P P P P P
Postsynaptic density 681 0.019 34 1.46 0.091 6 1.92 0.84 0.45 0.65 0.64 0.091 0.12 0.47 0.064 0.0015 4.00E-05
ARC complex 28 0.00048 6 6.06 0.005 2 17.42 1 1 1 1 0.0035 0.015 0.22 0.22 2.00E-05 0.0015
NMDAR complex 60 0.025 6 2.74 0.035 2 6.99 1 1 0.13 0.086 0.016 0.011 0.031 0.46 2.00E-05 2.00E-05