Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Jan 22;506(7487):179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12929

Extended Data Table 1a. Stratification of de novo mutations based on polygenic burden, presence of a ‘pathogenic’ CNV, or poor scholastic achievement.

Ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous (NS:S) and loss-of-function to missense (LoF:missense) de novo mutations were compared (Fisher’s exact test) between those found in individuals with a high polygenic score (top 50%) and those in the individuals in the bottom 50% of the polygenic score distribution (scores previously generated for this sample44). Individuals were additionally split based on the presence of a ‘pathogenic’ CNV. A ‘pathogenic’ CNV was defined as either a de novo CNV identified for these samples in Kirov, et al.20, or a CNV associated with psychiatric disease1. P-values were computed using Fisher’s exact test as in Table 2.

Probands with top 50% of polygenic scores Probands with bottom 50% of polygenic scores Probands with top 50% of polygenic scores or a ‘pathogenic’ CNV Probands with bottom 50% of polygenic scores and no ‘pathogenic’ CNV
NS 210 229 228 214
S 71 66 74 63
Ratio 2.96 3.47 3.08 3.4

p 0.43 0.63

LoF 24 29 26 27
missense 182 196 198 183
Ratio 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.15

p 0.77 0.77