Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 Feb 1;29(2):A223–A232. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.00A223

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A, Distributions of BPIlum for luminance gratings and for the gratings isolating the receptive field center cone class (BPIcc) for populations of midget ganglion cells and of parvocellular LGN cells show considerable similarity. For luminance there is much variability of BPIlum, with some cells showing little low-spatial-frequency roll-off (BPIlum = 1). B, Comparisons of BPIlum and BPIcc for the two cell samples on a cell-by-cell basis. The solid curves represent the relationship between the BPI for luminance and the center cone expected if the M:L ratio were 1:1. See the text for the derivation.