Table 6. Evaluation results of different gridded precipitation datasets in the Puli River basin.
Station | HX | QT | YJ | ||||||
APHRODITE | NCEP | T-S | APHRODITE | NCEP | T-S | APHRODITE | NCEP | T-S | |
R | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.62 |
ME (mm) | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.23 | −0.38 | 0.38 | 0.03 | −0.58 | 0.18 |
MAE(mm) | 2.38 | 3.34 | 2.65 | 2.63 | 3.04 | 2.98 | 2.56 | 3.19 | 2.94 |
F-test | 795.3 | 249.0 | 532.2 | 616.1 | 327.5 | 469.3 | 907.7 | 240.5 | 630.5 |
Note: *NCEP stands for NCEP-CFSR data and **T-S for trend surface data, the correlation analysis is tested in the significant level α = 0.05. For both basins, because the regression analysis number of data are all over 1000, thus, the F-test value at significant level α = 0.05 is adapted 3.84 for all linear regression analysis.