Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e113267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113267

Table 5. Experiment 2: Results of the paired-samples t-tests (test value = 0) conducted for the difference of the relative estimation errors in the comparisons width vs. depth and height vs. width, differentiated according to the seven levels of surface area.

Comparison Surface area Inline graphic SE Inline graphic t df p αcorr
Width vs. depth 16 m2 0.096 0.026 3.731 38 <.001* .007
25 m2 0.080 0.027 2.919 38 .006* .008
36 m2 0.0300 0.023 1.303 38 .200 .010
49 m2 0.0303 0.024 1.257 38 .216 .013
64 m 2 0.001 0.021 0.055 38 .957 .050
81 m2 0.003 0.026 0.115 38 .909 .025
100 m2 −0.019 0.021 −0.902 38 .373 .017
Height vs. width 16 m2 0.085 0.025 3.422 38 .002* .017
25 m2 0.109 0.026 4.146 38 <.001* .007
36 m2 0.112 0.030 3.660 38 .001* .008
49 m2 0.084 0.035 2.389 38 .022* .050
64 m 2 0.089 0.028 3.146 38 .003* .025
81 m2 0.144 0.042 3.452 38 .001* .013
100 m2 0.139 0.039 3.604 38 .001* .010

Note: αcorr indicates the Bonferroni-Holm adjusted alpha level. Significant p-values (two-tailed) are marked by an asterisk.