. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;93(12):1086–1094. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000163

Table 3.

The contributions of positive affect and negative affect to frequency of participation

Frequency of Participation	Model 1: Positive Affect (n=64)			Model 2: Negative Affect (n=64)			Model 3: Positive Affect x Cognition Interaction (n=64)
Frequency of Participation	B_stand	P		B_Stand	P		B	P
Intercept	-	-	Intercept	-	-		-	-
Self-awareness	–.109	.375	Self-awareness	–.106	.409	Self-awareness	–.018	.186
Cognition	.366	.004	Cognition	.367	.004	Cognition Group	.848	.109
Positive Affect	.398	.000	Positive Affect	.401	.001	Positive Affect	.034	.001
			Negative Affect	.011	.026	Positive Affect x Cognition Group^*	.034	.034
	R²=.32	<.001		R²=.32	<.001		R²=.29	.001
	R²_Adj=.29			R²_Adj=.28			R²_Adj=.24

Cognition Group: For the interaction, cognition was dichotomized at >1standard deviation below the mean on the cognitive composite score. Those with cognitive impairment (>1SD below the mean) are the referent group.