Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2013 Apr 3;37(2):162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.03.006

Table 2.

XRF to EM registration accuracy for different table heights and positions. Average TRE ± St. Dev. for each table height and position are shown (n=25 trials each)

Position
Type Table Height (cm) 1 2 3

39 0.99 ± 0.39 0.88 ± 0.44 0.68 ± 0.36
Prism 36 0.87 ± 0.38 0.87 ± 0.39 0.88 ± 0.39
33 1.45 ± 0.34 0.68 ± 0.21 0.81 ± 0.23

39 1.37 ± 0.38 1.00 ± 0.31 1.59 ± 0.31
Planar 36 1.44 ± 0.60 1.23 ± 0.54 1.60 ± 0.66
33 1.92 ± 0.48 1.67 ± 0.31 1.65 ± 0.41