Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 15;7(10):3647–3653.

Table 2.

The key data of the studies included in this meta-analysis

Study TP FP FN TN PLR NLR SEN% SPE% DOR
Inoue [6] 24 0 0 17 35.28 0.02 1.00 1.00 1715.00
Ferda [7] 13 1 3 7 6.50 0.21 0.81 0.88 30.33
Jolapara [8] 15 0 0 23 46.50 0.03 1.00 1.00 1457.00
Liu [9] 14 4 1 9 3.03 0.10 0.93 0.69 31.50
White [10] 23 2 2 7 4.14 0.10 0.92 0.78 40.25
Ma [11] 6 2 9 8 2.00 0.75 0.40 0.80 2.67
Roy [12] 29 7 3 17 3.11 0.13 0.91 0.71 23.48

PLR=Positive likelihood ratio; NLR=Negative likelihood ratio; TP=True positive; FP=False positive; FN=False negative; TN=True negative, SEN=Sensitivity; SPE=Specificity; DOR=Diagnostic odds ratio.