Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Aug;23(3):1205–1221. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0090

Table 4.

Effect of Independent Variables on Teachers’ Predicted Number of Oral Health Activities

Parent-focused activities (n=401) Brushing related activities (n=300)

Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P-value Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P-value
Independent variables
MSHS program 2.03** 1.26, 3.26 0.004 3.65** 1.69, 7.89 0.001
Received dental health training 2.11** 1.31, 3.38 0.002 2.33** 1.50, 3.62 0.00
Knowledge about…
 Amount of toothpaste to use 0.80 0.53, 1.21 0.29 0.72 0.47, 1.10 0.13
 Low-income children’s increased risk of tooth decay 0.49** 0.31, 0.77 0.002 1.17 0.55, 2.10 0.60
Value placed on oral health
 Moderate (11–13) 2.56* 1.26, 5.19 0.01 0.68 0.36, 1.31 0.25
 High (≥14) 2.80* 1.21, 6.65 0.02 0.98 0.51, 1.89 0.96
Perceived oral health self-efficacy
 Moderate (26–34) 1.58 0.93, 2.71 0.09 1.10 0.78, 1.91 0.68
 High (≥35) 6.03** 2.97, 12.26 0.00 2.11** 1.23, 3.90 0.008

MSHS, Migrant & Seasonal Head Start; HS, Head Start; SD, standard deviation

*

Statistically significant at the 5% level.

**

Statistically significant at the 1% level.

Ordered logit models with clustered standard errors also controlled for barriers to oral health activities, years employed by HS, education, and race/ethnicity.