Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Gambl Stud. 2014 Mar;30(1):125–140. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9346-5

Table 4.

Regression results for perceived norms for gambling frequency and quantity and identification with other student gamblers predicting gambling frequency and quantity

Outcome Predictor B β t p d
Gambling Perceived frequency .283 .287 12.19 < .001 .645
Frequency Identification with other student gamblers .482 .344 14.64 < .001 .775
Perceived frequency × identification with other student gamblers .078 .287 4.72 < .001 .250
Gambling Perceived quantity .135 .220 8.82 < .001 .477
Quantity Identification with other student gamblers .317 .326 13.09 < .001 .708
Perceived quantity × identification with other student gamblers .091 .508 8.48 < .001 .459