Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 20;10(11):e1003987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003987

Table 2. Average interaction energies and their standard deviations between CETP and anacetrapib.

Simulation Evdw (kJ/mol) Eelectrostatic (kJ/mol)
S1-helix −105.7±3.8 −30.0±7.8
S2-1nm −117.8±4.4 −18.4±2.0
S3-2nm −115.8±17.0 −13.7±1.4
S4-3nm Small figure Small figure
S5-4nm −38.4±19.0 −1.7±0.7
S6-convex −4.5±4.3 −0.1±0.1
S7-1N −68.1±0.4 −5.0±0.1
S8-2N −93.1±25.0 −20.1±6.8
S9-1C −79.1±8.2 −7.4±2.0
S10-3C −45.1±19.0 −5.9±2.9
L2, N-terminal anacetrapib −193.0±5.5 −8.7±1.7
L2, C-terminal anacetrapib −228.0±1.1 −4.7±0.3
L4 −217.1±3.2 −17.1±3.3
L5 −199.4±1.4 −12.1±0.9