Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 1;16(12):1079–1090. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1238-y

Table 5.

Randomized trials comparing LMWH with AVK for cancer-related VTE secondary prophylaxis

Clinical trial/year Study drug N Observation period Recurrent VTE (VKA vs. LMWH) Major bleeding (VKA vs. LMWH) Mortality (VKA vs. LMWH)
CLOT 2003 Dalteparin 25 % LMWH dose reduction after 1 month 672 6 months 17 vs. 9 %; p = 0.02 4 vs. 6 %; p = 0.27 41 vs. 39 %; p = 0.53
CANTHANOX 2002 Enoxaparin full dose once daily 146 3 months 21.1 vs. 10.5 %; p = 0.09 16 vs. 7 %; p = 0.09 22.7 vs. 11.3 %; p = 0.07
ONCENOX 2006 Enoxaparin 2 full-dose schemes (twice and once daily)a 122 6 months 10 vs. 6.9 vs. 6.3. %; p = NS 2.9 vs. 6.5 vs. 11.1 %; p = NS 32.4 vs. 22.6 vs. 41.7 %; p = NS
LITE 2006 Tinzaparin full dose 200 3 months 16 vs, 7 %; p = 0.044 7 vs. 7 %; p = NS 19 vs. 20 %; p = NS

aAVK vs. enoxaparin 1 mg/KG/12 h and AVK vs. enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg/day