. 2014 Nov 21;5:636. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00636

Table 3.

HPLC analysis of SQR9 when confronted with different fungal pathogens.

LPs	Peak areas of 4 antibiotics (mAU/s)
	M	VDK	SS	FOC	RSK	FS	PP
Bacillomycin D	26542 ± 286^c	52637 ± 290^e	55143 ± 247^f	51741 ± 584^e	22550 ± 1056^b	2021 ± 172^a	30889 ± 180^d
Fengycin	4666 ± 58^d	12709 ± 71^g	4015 ± 20^c	5084 ± 18^e	3624 ± 71^b	2677 ± 62^a	7753 ± 47^f
Surfactin	3617 ± 77^c	3302 ± 104^b	9040 ± 84^g	2846 ± 45^a	7640 ± 110^f	5622 ± 74^e	4294 ± 78^d
Bacillibactin	6933 ± 19^a	10523 ± 24^g	8267 ± 41^d	7621 ± 18^b	8911 ± 8^e	9717 ± 10^f	7796 ± 84^c

^a−b

Means and standard deviations were calculated from peak areas of SQR9 classified into different antibiotic production. Small letters in brackets indicate significant differences as determined by One-Way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests.

Peak areas of 4 antibiotics, mAU/s as unit. Extraction of SQR9 monoculture is represented as m, extractions of SQR9 agar confronted with VDK, Verticillium dahliae Kleb; SS, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; FOC, Fusarium oxysporum; RSK, Rhizoctonia solani; FS, Fusarium solani; PP, Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, respectively. Data represent the mean value ± standard error from three replicates. The data obtained were subjected to One-Way ANOVA analysis and means were analyzed by the Duncan's multiple range tests at P ≤ 0.05.