Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 28;137(12):3284–3299. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu293

Table 2.

Demographic information and neuropsychological scores of patients with PCA and typical Alzheimer’s disease

Demographic information PCA (n = 26) tAD (n = 7) Control (n = 14)

Gender (male:female) 10/16 12/5 5/9
Age (mean years ± SD) 61.4 ± 7.7 65.0 ± 5.1 62.7 ± 5.0
Education level (mean years ± SD) 14.6 ± 2.3 14.9 ± 2.4 16.1 ± 2.4
Disease duration (mean years ± SD) 4.7 ± 3.1 5.0 ± 1.7
MMSEa (mean/30 ± SD) 17.7 ± 5.0 17.5 ± 4.9

Neuropsychology test Max score Raw score
Norms/comment
PCA tAD Difference P-value
Background Neuropsychology
Short Recognition Memory Testb for words* (joint auditory/visual presentation) 25 19.5 ± 3.7 14.7 ± 1.5 <0.0001 PCA: 5th–10th percentile, tAD: ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 19)
Short Recognition Memory Test for faces* 25 17.8 ± 4.0 16.8 ± 3.0 >0.3 Both ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 18)
Concrete Synonyms testc 25 20.0 ± 3.7 20.9 ± 2.5 >0.4 Both 10th–25th percentile
Naming (verbal description) 20 11.4 ± 6.6 13.7 ± 6.4 >0.2 Both ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 15)
Cognitive estimatesd (error score) 30 14.6 ± 7.5 10.6 ± 5.0 0.074 Both ∼<1st percentile (cut-off: 9)
Calculation (GDAe)* 24 1.6 ± 2.9 4.9 ± 5.3 <0.05 PCA: ∼<5th percentile, tAD:5th-25th percentile
Spelling (GDSTf- Set B, first 20 items)* 20 8.9 ± 6.5 10.8 ± 5.6 >0.3 Both 10th–25th percentile
Gesture production testg 15 12.7 ± 3.4 14.1 ± 1.4 >0.1
Digit span (forwards) 12 6.0 ± 2.6 6.1 ± 1.4 >0.8 Both 25th–50th percentile
Max forwards 8 5.6 ± 1.8 5.5 ± 0.8 >0.9
Digit span (backwards) 12 2.6 ± 1.7 3.6 ± 1.9 0.078 Both 5th–10th percentile
Max backwards 7 2.3 ± 1.3 3.3 ± 1.1 <0.05
CORVISTh reading test 16 13.8 ± 3.0 15.7 ± 0.8 <0.05
Spatial attentioni:
    Small words 48 39.9 ± 10.7 47.2 ± 2.2 <0.0005
    Large words 48 37.8 ± 12.5 47.1 ± 1.6 <0.0005
Visual assessment
Early visual processing
Visual acuity (CORVIST): Snellen 6/9 (median 6/9) (median 6/9) Normal acuity
Figure-ground discrimination (VOSPj) 20 16.3 ± 3.0 18.6 ± 1.3 <0.01 PCA: ∼<5th percentile, tAD: 5th–10th percentile
Shape discriminationk 20 12.6 ± 3.9 17.2 ± 3.2 <0.0005 Healthy controls do not make any errors
Hue discrimination (CORVIST) 4 2.6 ± 1.1 3.0 ± 1.3 >0.3
Visuoperceptual processing
Object Decision (VOSP)* 20 10.0 ± 4.1 15.9 ± 2.4 <0.0001 PCA: ∼<5th percentile, tAD: 10th–25th percentile
Fragmented letters (VOSP) 20 2.9 ± 3.9 13.5 ± 6.6 <0.0001 Both ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 16)
Unusual and usual views:l
    Unusual 20 6.6 ± 6.8 9.9 ± 5.1 >0.1 Both ∼<1st percentile (cut-off: 12)
    Usual 20 8.4 ± 5.5 16.5 ± 4.0 <0.0001 Both ∼<1st percentile (cut-off: 18)
Visuospatial processing
Number location (VOSP)* 10 1.8 ± 2.5 5.7 ± 3.8 <0.005 Both ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 6)
Dot counting (VOSP) 10 3.4 ± 3.2 8.1 ± 3.1 <0.0001 Both ∼<5th percentile
A Cancellationm: Completion time 90 s 79.5 s ± 17.4 36.3 s ± 15.7 <0.0001 Both ∼<5th percentile (cut-off: 32 s)
A Cancellationm: Number of letters missed 19 6.6 ± 5.1 0.53 ± 1.1 <0.0005

*Behavioural screening tests supportive of PCA diagnosis; tAD = typical Alzheimer’s disease.

eGraded Difficulty Arithmetic test (GDA) (Jackson and Warrington, 1986).

fGraded Difficulty Spelling Test (GDST) (Baxter and Warrington, 1994).

gCrutch (unpublished).

hCortical Visual Screening Test (CORVIST) (James et al., 2001).

iPerceptual corpus (Yong et al., 2014).

jVisual Object and Space Perception Battery (VOSP) (Warrington and James, 1991).

kEfron (1968): oblong edge ratio 1:1.20.