Table 1. Regulated transcription factors during in vitro organogenesis.
Gene family | No. | Percentage | W1 vs W0 | W2 vs W0 | W3 vs W0 | W4 vs W0 | ||||
Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | |||
zinc finger | 48 | 19.4% | 6 | 18 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 25 | 14 | 20 |
C2H2* | 12 | 4.8% | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
TAZ* | 11 | 4.4% | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
Dof* | 10 | 4.0% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
CO-like* | 10 | 4.0% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
C3H* | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||
PHD* | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
GATA* | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
MYB | 32 | 12.9% | 13 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 8 | 16 | 8 |
AP2/ERF | 26 | 10.5% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 17 | 7 | 13 |
bHLH | 21 | 8.5% | 3 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 9 | |
HB | 16 | 6.5% | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 6 | ||
WRKY | 12 | 4.8% | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 5 | ||
NAC | 11 | 4.4% | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | |
bZIP | 9 | 3.6% | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | ||
GRAS | 9 | 3.6% | 1 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 3 | ||
ARF | 8 | 3.2% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | |
MADS | 8 | 3.2% | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
AUX/IAA | 6 | 2.4% | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | ||||
LBD | 5 | 2.0% | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
ABI3 | 4 | 1.6% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
LUG | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||
SET | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
HSF | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
CAMTA | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||
GRF | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | |||||||
Trihelix | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
TCP | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
JUMONJI | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||
E2F | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | |||||||
HMG | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
LIM | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
CCAAT | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||||
TLP | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
FHA | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||||
PLATZ | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||||
Nin-like | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||||
Total | 248 | 100% | 45 | 79 | 12 | 51 | 73 | 126 | 80 | 89 |
*Subgroup of zinc finger family.