Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2014 May 21;25(6):1076–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.007

Table 3.

Results of Path Analysis

Direct Effect Indirect Effect via
Perceived
availability/
Perceived risk
Total Indirect
Effect
Total Effect R2
On Intentions to Use 0.17***
  Perceived Avail. 0.15***
  Perceived Risk −0.22**
  Age −0.004 0.02 / 0.03 0.05* 0.04
  Gender 0.03 0.01 / −0.03* −0.02 0.01
  Relationship status 0.03 0.001 / −0.08** −0.08* −0.04
  Parental status 0.10 0.004 / −0.01 −0.01 0.09
  Employment status 0.05 0.001 / −0.04* −0.04* 0.01
  Frequency of use 0.23*** 0.03** / 0.04* 0.07*** 0.30***
On Expectations of Desire 0.20***
  Perceived Avail. 0.16***
  Perceived Risk −0.23***
  Age −0.04 0.02 / 0.03* 0.05* 0.01
  Gender 0.01 0.01 / −0.03* −0.02 −0.01
  Relationship status 0.03 0.001 / −0.08** −0.08* −0.05
  Parental status 0.08 0.004 / −0.01 −0.01 0.07
  Employment status 0.06 0.001 / −0.04* −0.04* 0.02
  Frequency of use 0.28*** 0.04** / 0.04* 0.07*** 0.35***
On Perceived Availability 0.07**
  Age 0.10
  Gender 0.07
  Relationship status 0.01
  Parental status 0.03
  Employment status 0.01
  Frequency of use 0.22***
On Perceived Risk 0.16***
  Age −0.14*
  Gender 0.14*
  Relationship status 0.35***
  Parental status 0.06
  Employment status 0.18**
  Frequency of use −0.16**
Correlation of
  Perceived avail. And Perceived Risk −0.17**
  Intentions to use And Expectations of desire 0.75***

Note: two-tailed p-value for significance test:

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05