Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 17;30(1):91–101. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2903-7

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical and laboratory data of patients receiving or not receiving albumin infusions or thromboembolic prophylaxisa

Clinical and laboratory data
Albumin infusion Albumin (g/dL) Serum Na (mmol/L) Urine output (mL/kg/h) sBP (SDS) dBP (SDS) BMI (SDS)
Yes 1.46 ± 0.4 135.3 ± 3.4 1.6 ± 1.1 1.2 ± 1.1 1.4 ± 1.0 0.9 ± 1.0
No 1.36 ± 0.4 137.1 ± 2.8 1.1 ± 0.8 0.9 ± 1.13 1.05 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 1.0
p value NS NS NS NS NS NS
Thromboembolic prophylaxis (ASA) Albumin (g/dL) Platelets (×103/μL) Antithrombin III (%) Fibrinogen (mg/dL) Cholesterol (mg/dL) Triglycerides (mg/dL)
Yes 1.3 ± 0.4 438 ± 18.0 65 ± 4.0 687 ± 34 397 ± 12.2 196 ± 15.0
No 1.4 ± 0.4 430 ± 10.9 71 ± 4.1 651 ± 25 402 ± 8.5 217 ± 12.7
p value NS NS NS NS NS NS

sBP, Systolic blood pressure; dBP, diastolic blood pressure; NS, not significant

aThis analysis did not reveal any difference between the two group in terms of Albumin infusion and thromboembolic prophylaxis. No differences were found when data were analyzed separately in children treated by pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists