Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 10;18(7):2012–2023. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2483

Table 3.

Multivariate Cox regression model for OS and EFS considering the (Y96) model and clinical and biologically relevant parameters for risk stratification of set 3 patients

Survival
Event
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Univariate model
Model (Y96) 28.09 (8.65–91.19) <0.001 15.59 (7.07–34.34) <0.001
Age 11.68 (5.40–25.27) <0.001 5.44 (3.16–9.36) <0.001
Model (Y96) 15.85 (4.75–52.91) <0.001 11.07 (4.89–25.07) <0.001
Age 5.41 (2.46–11.95) <0.001 2.61 (1.49–4.59) 0.001
INSS stage 10.14 (5.1–20.16) <0.001 6.27 (3.72–10.57) <0.001
Model (Y96) 15.13 (4.41–51.97) <0.001 10.32 (4.46–23.86) <0.001
INSS stage 3.65 (1.78–7.5) <0.001 2.48 (1.42–4.31) 0.001
MYCN 8.7 (4.7–16.1) <0.001 4.7 (2.73–8.1) <0.001
Model (Y96) 20.2 (6.02–67.73) <0.001 13.53 (6–30.5) <0.001
MYCN 2.74 (1.46–5.12) 0.002 1.59 (0.91–2.77) 0.105
1p LOH 7.48 (4.06–13.77) <0.001 4.25 (2.57–7.03) <0.001
Model (Y96) 18.92 (5.63–63.52) <0.001 12.83 (5.67–29.01) <0.001
1p LOH 2.93 (1.56–5.47) 0.001 1.76 (1.05–2.95) 0.033
Multivariate model
Model (Y96) 9.9 (2.8–35.3) <0.001 836 (3.6–30.4) <0.001
MYCW 3.2 (1.7–6.0) <0.001 1.7 (0.99–3.0) 0.053
INSS stage 4.2 (2.0–8.4) <0.001 2.6 (1.5–4.5) 0.001

NOTE: The analysis was conducted sequentially, adding one variable at each step, to assess how the presence of each variable influences the performance of the (Y96) model. The (Y96) model was statistically significantly associated with OS and EFS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Abbreviation: NE, "non evaluable" P value due to "no cases" in a combination of the 2 factors.