Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2014 Dec 22;281(1797):20141636. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1636

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 3. — Population divergence in mate preferences towards con- and heterospecific mates in allopatric (A1–A4) and sympatric populations (S1–S4). Line at ‘1.0’ shows the standardized average response towards conspecific mates. Open symbols shows mean (±95% CIs) response towards conspecifics, and closed symbols mean response (±95% CIs) towards heterospecifics. (a) Female population divergence (two-way ANOVA: population (P): F_7,395 = 35.475, p < 0.001; species (S): F_1,395 = 4.217, p = 0.04; P × S: F_7,395 = 24.828, p < 0.001). (b) Male population divergence (two-way ANOVA: population (P): F_6,205 = 8.741, p < 0.001; species (S): F_1,205 = 853.357, p < 0.001; P × S: F_6,205 = 9.852, p < 0.001). (c) Elevated population divergence in female and male mate preferences towards heterospecifics in allopatric versus sympatric populations (nested mixed model analysis: sex × population ecology: F_1,226 = 13.640; p = 0.003; electronic supplementary material, table S2: Model 2).