Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;27(6):553–561. doi: 10.1111/tri.12295

Table 5.

Characteristics of the investigated cohort of recipients.

All (n = 35) Standard (n = 28) EVLP (n = 7) P
Age, years 47 ± 15 49 ± 14 38 ± 15 0.09
BMI, kg/m2 22 [18–25] 23 [18–25] 20 [17–23] 0.28
Diagnosis
 Cystic fibrosis, n (%) 14 (40) 10 (36) 4 (57) 0.20
 Pulmonary fibrosis, n (%) 11 (31) 11 (40) 0 (0)
 Other, n (%) 10 (29) 7 (25) 3 (43)
ICU admission pretransplant, n (%) 9 (26) 5 (18) 4 (57) 0.05
Urgent listing, n (%) 9 (26) 5 (18) 4 (57) 0.05
ECMO bridge to transplant, n (%) 8 (23) 5 (18) 3 (43) 0.31
Noninvasive ventilation (%) 5 (14) 4 (14) 1 (14) 1.00
Invasive ventilation (%) 2 (6) 1 (4) 1 (14) 0.37
LAS transplantation 39 [36–58] 39 [36–46] 79 [40–84] <0.05
Karnofsky index 60 [13–70] 65 [40–70] 20 [10–50] <0.05
Lung transplant procedure
 Single, n (%) 15 (43) 14 (50) 1 (14) 0.20
 Double, n (%) 20 (57) 14 (50) 6 (86)
Total surgical time, min 617 ± 157 609 ± 169 647 ± 93 0.58
Intraoperative ECMO, n (%) 13 (37) 8 (26) 5 (71) 0.07
Intraoperative ECMO-VA, n (%) 6 (17) 4 (14) 2 (29) 0.58

Data of the entire cohort of investigated recipients (All) are presented, comparing data of Standard recipients with EVLP recipients (Student's t-test; P < 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median and 25°–75° percentile in square brackets.

n, number of patients; BMI, body mass index; ICU, intensive care unit; LAS, lung allocation score; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VA, venous arterial.