Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2014 Sep 3;13(8):802–811. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12170

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dcdc2del2/del2 subjects show impaired embedded tone performance. (a) rapid auditory processing performance on the silent gap 0–100 ms paradigm were comparable between Dcdc2del2/del2 subjects and WT controls. (b) Analysis of embedded tone performance on the 0–100 ms paradigm also saw no significant difference in auditory processing ability, but (c) Dcdc2del2/del2 subjects did show impaired auditory processing performance on the embedded tone 0–10 ms task. Note that higher attenuation scores indicate poorer auditory discrimination of the cue. *P<0.05.