Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2014 May 22;14(1):73–81. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0589-1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) Tensile properties of stimulated constructs, Young’s modulus (EY) (left) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) (right) in MPa. All data are reported as mean +/− standard deviation. Different letters between groups indicate statistical significance at p<0.05. (b) Gross morphology of stimulated and unstimulated constructs, tissue was white and glossy in appearance with a firm consistency. (c) Representative Picrosirius Red and Safranin-O/Fast green histology staining of the stimulated and unstimulated control constructs (40×).