Table 1.
Design and Results for Functional Imaging Studies of Cognitive Reappraisal
#
|
Study
|
Design
|
Results
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control Systems
|
Emotion systems
|
|||||||||||
Stimulus
|
Emotion
|
Strategy
|
Goal
|
lat PFC
|
ACC
|
med PFC
|
Amyg
|
Insula
|
Other
|
Behavior
|
||
1 | Beauregard et al, 2001 | Films | Sexual Arousal | More Dist | Dec | Ld/Rd | Rd | Rd | R | - | Hyp | Less arousal |
2 | Ochsner et al, 2002 | Images | Neg | Reint | Dec | Ldv | Ld | - | L | L | - | Less affect |
3 | Schaeffer et al, 2002 | Images | Neg | Reint | Maintain | nr | nr | nr | L/RΩΩ | nr | nr | Sustained affect |
4 | Levesque et al, 2003 | Films | Sadness | More Dist | Dec | Rdv | - | - | L | L | - | Less sad |
5 | Ochsner et al, 2004 | Images | Neg | Reint+More Dist | Dec | Ld/Rd | Lv/Rv | - | L/R | L/R | - | Less affect |
Images | Neg | Reint+ Less Dist | Inc | Ld | Lv | Ld | L | - | - | More affect | ||
Images | Neg | Reint > More Dist | Dec | Ld | - | - | - | - | - | No difference | ||
Images | Neg | More Dist > Reint | Dec | - | Ls | - | - | - | - | No difference | ||
6 | Levesque et al, 2004Ω | Films | Sadness | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rdv | Rd | Ld/Rd | - | - | - | Less sadness |
7 | Kalisch et al, 2005 | Anticip Shock | Anxiety | Dist | Dec | Rd | - | Rd | - | - | R dmPFC | Less Anxiety, HR |
8 | Phan et al, 2005 | Images | Neg | Reint | Dec | Ld/Rdv | Ld/Rd | Rd | L | Ra | - | Less affect |
9 | Harenski et al, 2006 | Images | Neg Nonmoral | Reint | Dec | - | - | - | - | - | Less affect | |
Images | Moral Violation | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rv | - | - | L/R | - | - | Less affect | ||
Images | Moral > Neg | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rd | Rd | Ld | - | - | - | Less affect | ||
10 | Kalisch et al, 2006 | Anticip Shock | Anxiety | More Dist | Dec | Ld | Ls | - | - | - | - | NC anxiety |
11 | Ohira et al, 2006 | Images | Neg + Pos | Supp** | Dec | Lv | Lv/Rv | L | - R Tmp pole | NC affect; SCL up | ||
12 | Urry et al, 2006 | Images | Neg | Reint | Dec | - | - | Ld/Rv* | L*/R* | - | - | Less affect, pupils dilate |
Images | Neg | Reint | Inc | Ldv | Ld | Ld | L/R | - | - | More affect, pupils dilate | ||
13 | Eippert et al, 2006 | Images | Neg | More Dist | Dec | Ldv | Rd/Ld | - | L | - | - | Less SCL |
Images | Neg | Less Dist | Inc | Ld/Rdv | Ld/Rd | Rd | L/R | - | - | More SCL/Startle | ||
14 | Kim et al, 2007 | Images | Neg | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rdv | Ld/Rd | - | - | - | - | Less arousal |
Pos | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rdv | Ld/Rd | - | R | - | - | More arousal | |||
Pos > Neg | Reint | Dec | - | - | - | - | - | Less arousal | ||||
Neg > Pos | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rdv | Ld/Rd | - | - | - | - | Less arousal | |||
Neg | Reint | Inc | Ldv | Rdv | Ld/Rd | L | - | - | More arousal | |||
Pos | Reint | Inc | Ldv/Rv | Rd | L/R | - | - | More arousal | ||||
Pos > Neg | Reint | Inc | Ldv/Rd | - | Ld | L | - | - | More arousal | |||
Neg > Pos | Reint | Inc | - | - | Rd | - | - | More arousal | ||||
15 | Goldin et al, in press | Films | Disgust | Reint | Dec | Ldv/Rd (ely) | - | Ld (ely) | R (lt) | L (lt) | - | Less affect |
Films | Disgust | Suppress face | Dec | Lv/Rdv (lt) | - | d (lt) | R(lt) up | La (lt) up | - | Less affect + face | ||
Films | Disgust | Reint > Supp | Dec | Ldv (ely) | - | Ld (ely) | - | La (ely) | - | Less affect | ||
Films | Disgust | Supp > Reint | Dec | Lv/Rv (lt) | d (lt) | Lv (lt) | - | - | - | Less face | ||
16 | van Reekum et al, in press | Images | Neg | Reint | Inc>Dec>Base | Ldv/Rdv | Rd | - | - | - | Inc/Dec more/less affect | |
Images | Neg | Reint | Inc>Dec=Base | - | Lv | - | - | - | - | as above | ||
Images | Neg | Reint | Inc=Base>Dec | - | - | - | L/R | - | - | as above | ||
Images | Neg | Reint | Inc>Base>Dec | - | - | - | - | - | R Put | as above |
Note: Studies are organized chronologically. Unless otherwise specified, activations are for contrasts in which the same stimulus type (e.g. negative image) is presented in two conditions: A baseline condition in which emotional responses are allowed to flow naturally, and a reappraisal condition in which responses are regulated cognitively. Column labels: # = identifier for referring to study in text; Study = study listed in references; Stimulus = type of stimulus employed; Emotion = type of emotional/affective response elicited; Strategy = type of strategy (varying psychological distance or reinterpreting the meaning of the stimulus); Goal = increase or decrease response; Control Systems = systems associated with control processes; Emotion Systems = systems associated with emotional responses. Abbreviations: For Stimulus: Anticip = anticipate; For Emotion: Pos = positive affect, Neg = negative affect; For Strategy: reint = cognitively reinterpret, dist = become more or less psychologically distant, face = facial expression, supp = suppress facial behavior; For Control and Emotion Systems: Unless otherwise noted, control systems are activated and emotion systems are modulated in accord with reappraisal goals; nr = not reported, L = left, R = right, d = dorsal, v = ventral, m = medial, l = lateral, a = anterior, PFC = prefrontal cortex, ACC = anterior cingulate cortex, Amyg = amygdala, Hyp = hypothalamus, ely = activity in early phase of stimulus presentation, lt = activity in late phase of stimulus presentation; For Behavior: HR = heart rate, pupils dilate = greater pupil dilation, which is an indicator of effort or arousal, face = facial expression, NC = no change.
For Study 9,
means that regions of vmPFC correlate inversely with the amygdala, but neither region showed significant change in the overall group contrast to identify regions activated or modulated by reappraisal.
Ohira et al instructed participants to, “suppress emotional response” but didn’t make clear if that meant expressive behavior or experience. We assume the former because they observed no changes in experience and compared their paper to Gross’s expressive suppression work.
Used only children as participants.
Did ROI analyses collapsing across both amygdalae.