Methods | RCT, 2-arm trial. | |
Participants | Setting: Los Angeles hospital, USA, 1996-2000 120 women with diabetes. Inclusion criteria: women with insulin dependent or other diabetes, gestational age 38 weeks (confirmed by ultrasound), not in labour, normal AFI (> 5 cm), normal FHR. Women compliant with hospital appointments and home glucose monitoring Exclusion criteria: women with multiple pregnancies, ruptured membranes, vaginal bleeding, prior uterine surgery, active genital herpes, glaucoma, serious medical disease, parity > 5, fetal weight > 4500 g or < 2000 g |
|
Interventions | Study over 7 days. Intervention group: single dose of vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg Comparison group: placebo of similar appearance. Both groups were observed for 4 hrs and if there were no signs of fetal distress of painful contractions women were sent home. Reviewed after 3-4 days. If labour had not started then intervention/placebo was repeated. At 7 days women not in labour were induced |
|
Outcomes | Additional induction agents required (oxytocin), mode of delivery, uterine hyperstimulation, neonatal condition at delivery | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors’ judgement | Description |
Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | Computer generated sequence. |
Allocation concealment? | Yes | Coded drug boxes. Pharmacy prepared and distributed medication according to the randomisation schedule |
Blinding? Women |
Yes | Placebo controlled trial. |
Blinding? Clinical staff |
Yes | |
Blinding? Outcome assessor |
Unclear | Not clear when code revealed. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes |
Unclear | 120 women randomised and no loss to follow up was apparent but denominators in the data tables were not always clear |
Free of other bias? | Yes |