Table 4.
Comparison of P(3HB) production using different microorganism and fed-batch strategies
| Organism | Feeding strategy | DWC (g l−1) | P(3HB) (g l−1) | P(3HB) productivity (g l1 h−1) | P(3HB) content (% wt) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. megabacterium BA-019 | pH stat | 72.6 | 30.5 | 1.27 | 42 | Kulpreecha et al., 2009 |
| Intermittent | 90.7 | 41.6 | 1.73 | 46 | Kanjanachumpol et al., 2013 | |
| C. necator | Pulses | 75 | 53 | 0.92 | 71 | Tanadchangsaeng and Yu, 2012 |
| Pulses | 83 | 67.2 | 2.5 | 81 | Pradella et al., 2012 | |
| Pulses | 82.5 | 51.2 | 1.52 | 62 | Cavalheiro et al., 2009 | |
| Exponential + coupled to alkali addition monitoring + constant with N2 limitation | 164 | 125 | 2.03 | 76.2 | Mozumder et al., 2014 | |
| E. coli | pH stat | 119.5 | 96.2 | 2.57 | 80 | Ahn et al., 2000 |
| A. vinelandii | Exponential + pulses | 37.2 | 27.3 | 0.5 | 73.3 | García et al., 2013 |