Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 28;7(4):294–306. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12111

Table 2.

Plant growth-promoting potential and abiotic stress resistance of the microbial subcollection.

genus Nr. of isolates Strain HC PGP activities and tolerances to abioticstress (%) ACCd 4°C 50°C Average % survival after 14d of water stress Average % survival after 14d of N- and C-starvation

IAA P Sol. Sid. Org. Acid Acetoin
Arthrobacter 3 34;66;100 100 100 0 0 33 100 100 37.6 ± 1.13
Bacillus 2 26;45 50 100 0 100 0 100 100 50 <5.0 ± 1.2 80.6 ± 3.2
Burkholderia 11 19;18;31;32;64;7 100 45 100 0 100 75 100 35.5 ± 2.4 74.5 ± 2.2
9;106;114;122;12 9
3;128
Methylobacterium 1 91 100 0 0 100 0 100 0 100 42.2 52.2
Mycobacterium 1 96 100 0 0 100 0 100 0 100 47.6 57.6
Pseud omonas 4 1;88;94;131 75 50 100 100 0 100 50 50 62.2 ± 2.3 62.2 ± 1.3
Ralstonia 3 4;90;111 0 0 100 0 100 100 50 100 49.8 ± 1.2 69.8 ± 2.2
Rhodanobacter 2 50;52 100 100 0 0 0 0 100 100 82.5 ± 1.3 92.5 ± 1.2
Sinomonas 1 35 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 92.4 95.4
Vario vorax 1 92 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 87.5 89.5
Viridibacillus 1 16 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 81.6 72.7
TOTAL (%) 43.3 73.3 43.2 66.7 13.3 86.6 64.0 86.7

The PGP activities are expressed in percentage of isolates within each genus that score positive for the test. In the last row, the total percentage of isolates scoring positive for PGP activities and tolerance to abiotic stress is shown. P Sol., inorganic phosphate solubilization; Sid., siderophores production; Org. Acid, organic acid production; AACd, ACC deaminase activity.