Table 2.
Model 1 (n = 837) | Model 2 (n = 837) | Model 3 (n = 837) | Model 4 (n = 837 | Model 5 (n = 837) | Model 6 (n = 837) | Model 7 (n = 837) | Model 8 (n = 837) | Model 9 (n = 837) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed Effects | |||||||||
Synchrony | t = 3.65*** | t = 3.29** | t = 3.52*** | t = 3.51*** | t = 3.47*** | t = 3.73*** | t = 3.75*** | t = 3.71*** | |
Interaction type | F = 10.3**** | F = 13.3**** | F = 13.3**** | F = 13.3**** | F = 14.1**** | F = 14.1**** | F = 14.1**** | ||
Interaction type × Synchrony | F = 4.86** | F = 4.86** | F = 4.88** | F = 4.41* | F = 4.48* | F = 4.47* | |||
Age | t = 0.18 | ||||||||
Sex[male] | t = 1.72 | t = 1.72 | t = 1.89 | t = 1.28 | |||||
Sex[male] × Synchrony | t = -3.62*** | t = -3.56*** | t = -3.60*** | ||||||
Factor 1 selfish-domineering | t = .71 | ||||||||
Factor 2 non-assertive-accommodating | t = -.99 | ||||||||
Factor 3 cold-avoidant | t = -1.63 | ||||||||
Factor 4 ambivalent-troubled | t = -.95 | ||||||||
Factor 5 introverted-distressed | t = -2.42* | t = -2.84** | |||||||
Factor 6 open-empathic | t = 1.57 | ||||||||
Random Effects | |||||||||
Participant [Dyad] (% variance) | 48.85 | 49.41 | 50.04 | 50.58 | 50.89 | 51.11 | 51.63 | 51.63 | 51.68 |
Dyad (% variance) | 16.27 | 15.95 | 16.06 | 15.54 | 15.33 | 14.65 | 14.67 | 14.47 | 13.28 |
Whole model variance (%) | 71.23 | 71.76 | 72.64 | 72.98 | 72.99 | 72.98 | 73.49 | 73.49 | 73.47 |
AIC | 1385.4 | 1373.6 | 1369.1 | 1361.0 | 1370.3 | 1364.2 | 1352.6 | 1374.0 | 1350.6 |
Factor, orthogonal factors of participants’ traits; AIC, Akaike’s Information Criterion. PANAS, Positive and Negative Affect Scale. AIC minimum printed in boldface. For each model, fixed effects estimates, random effects estimates, whole model variance and AIC are listed (top to bottom). *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001; ****p< 0.0001.