Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 30;1(9):670–678. doi: 10.1002/acn3.95

Table 2.

Comparison of continuous UPSIT score: mixed-effect model

Predictors and group comparisons1 Β SE P 95% Confidence interval
Sex 2.94 0.55 <0.001 (1.87, 4.01)
Age at UPSIT −0.16 0.02 <0.001 (−0.20, −0.12)
MoCA 0.18 0.09 0.06 (0.01, 0.36)
US site 2.00 0.64 0.002 (0.75, 3.24)
Ever smoke 0.30 0.55 0.59 (−0.79, 1.39)
IPD vs. control −12.75 1.12 <0.001 (−14.95, −10.54)
MC vs. control −9.08 1.14 <0.001 (−11.31, −6.84)
NMC vs. control −1.22 1.08 0.26 (−3.34, 0.91)
NC-F vs. control −2.19 1.08 0.04 (−4.31, −0.07)
Further group comparisons2
 IPD vs. MC −3.67 1.01 <0.001 (−5.66, −1.68)
 MC vs. NMC −7.86 0.98 <0.001 (−9.78, −5.93)
 MC vs. NC-F −6.88 0.99 <0.001 (−8.82, −4.95)
 NMC vs. NC-F 0.97 0.62 0.12 (−0.24, 2.18)
 IPD vs. NC-F −10.55 0.86 <0.001 (−12.23, −8.98)

SE, standard error; US, United States site; UPSIT, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; IPD, idiopathic PD; MC, manifesting carrier; NMC, nonmanifesting carrier; NC-F, noncarrier family member.

1

Group comparisons and the covariates were evaluated in the same model (using control group as the reference)

2

Additional group comparisons were deduced from the main model.