Table 4.

Comparison of responses in abdominal obesity to aerobic exercise training across the FABP2 wild and mutant type

			mean±SD	P	P-a
Waist	Wild type (N = 117)	pre	90.2±6.0	.001	.146
		post	86.3±6.9
	Mutant type (N = 126)	pre	91.9±6.1	.001
		post	87.3±5.7
Waist Hip Ratio	Wild type (N = 117)	pre	.93±.04	.001	.225
		post	.91±.06
	Mutant type (N = 126)	pre	.95±.05	.001
		post	.93±.05
Total abdominal area (mm2)	Wild type (N = 117)	pre	47367.5±4210.9	.077	.173
		post	45809.3±6064.1
	Mutant type (N = 126)	pre	52389.9±7100.7	.001
		post	49134.8±5562.6
Visceral area (mm2)	Wild type (N = 117)	pre	8751.4±3411.2	.002	.661
		post	7698.8±2961.8
	Mutant type (N = 126)	pre	9616.2±3213.2	.001
		post	8721.5±3275.4
Subcutaneo us area (mm2)	Wild type (N = 117)	pre	19589.4±4397.5	.001	.172
		post	17636.1±4679.2
	Mutant type (N = 126)	pre	20093.8±4875	.001
		post	18752.1 ±5154.7

P: within group effect; P-a: between group effect