Table 1. The comparison of the computational time cost of the proposed method and the conventional method.
Methods | Number of used detector point (patterns) | Computational time |
---|---|---|
Conventional method | 11215 | 17.4 min |
| ||
Proposed method | 16 | 0.8 s |
32 | 1.3 s | |
64 | 2.4 s | |
128 | 4.7 s | |
256 | 7.6 s | |
512 | 9.8 s | |
1024 | 11.6 s |