Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 17;94(2):251–258. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch135

Table 1.

The significance of the differences in plant parameters resulting from the interactions among factors A (N, NM, NR and NRM), B (N supplies LN and HN) and C (harvest dates T1 and T2)

Source of variance A B C A × B A × C B × C A × B × C
Degrees of freedom
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
Variables:
    Photosynthetic rate (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) *** *** *** *** ** ** *
AMF
    AC (%) *** *** *** * ns ns ns
    VC (%) *** *** * *** * ns ns
    HC (%) *** *** *** *** ns ns ns
N, P content
    Leaf N (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** *** * ns
    Stem N (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** *** ns ns
    Root N (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** ** * ns
    Nodule N (mg g−1) *** *** *** ns ns * ns
    Leaf P (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** ** ** ns
    Stem P (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** *** *** **
    Root P (mg g−1) *** *** *** *** *** *** **
    Nodule P (mg g−1) *** *** *** ns ns ** ns
Biomass of plant part
    Leaf area (cm2 plant−1) *** *** *** *** *** ** *
    Leaf d. wt (g plant−1) *** *** *** ** * ** ns
    Stem d. wt (g plant−1) *** *** *** ns * * ns
    Root d. wt (g plant−1) *** *** *** * * ** ns
    Nodule d. wt (g plant−1) * *** *** ns ns *** ns
    Biomass (g plant−1) *** *** *** *** *** *** ns

Percentage AMF colonization, dry mass, leaf area, elemental N and P concentrations of leaves, stems, roots and nodules were analysed by three-way ANOVA with residual estimation, for main effects and interaction effects.

*, **, *** Effects that are significant at P < 0·05, 0·01 and 0·001, respectively; ns, effects that are not significant at P < 0·05.