Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 17;94(2):251–258. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch135

Table 2.

(a) N and (b) P content in leaf, stem, root and nodule of Vicia faba L. as influenced by the factors A (N, NM, NR and NRM), B (N supplies LN and HN) and C (harvest intervals T1 and T2)

(a) Variable value = N concentration (mg g−1 dry mass)
Factors
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
A
B
C
Leaf N
Tukey-t
Stem N
Tukey-t
Root N
Tukey-t
Nodule N
Tukey-t
N LN T1 25·61 ± 1·07 a 11·79 ± 0·46 a 20·48 ± 0·98 a
N LN T2 25·64 ± 0·78 a 11·89 ± 0·54 a 20·15 ± 0·53 a
N HN T1 39·51 ± 0·61 cd 19·61 ± 0·59 cd 23·67 ± 1·34 bc
N HN T2 40·05 ± 0·65 de 19·69 ± 0·66 cd 23·84 ± 0·49 bcd
NM LN T1 27·14 ± 0·85 a 13·10 ± 0·65 ab 22·62 ± 0·94 ab
NM LN T2 29·47 ± 0·55 b 14·99 ± 0·53 b 25·01 ± 0·56 bcde
NM HN T1 40·61 ± 0·70 de 20·23 ± 0·68 d 24·08 ± 0·48 bcd
NM HN T2 41·80 ± 0·95 ef 21·37 ± 0·41 def 24·89 ± 0·81 bcde
NR LN T1 37·62 ± 1·10 c 17·81 ± 0·45 c 25·67 ± 0·95 cdef 51·53 ± 0·75 abc
NR LN T2 41·44 ± 1·13 def 20·31 ± 0·40 de 28·60 ± 1·17 gh 54·40 ± 1·61 c
NR HN T1 41·70 ± 0·64 ef 20·98 ± 0·74 def 26·68 ± 1·01 defg 49·99 ± 0·64 a
NR HN T2 43·31 ± 0·92 fg 22·58 ± 0·94 f 28·40 ± 1·22 fgh 50·83 ± 1·49 ab
NMR LN T1 41·97 ± 0·73 ef 22·50 ± 0·93 f 27·45 ± 1·13 efg 53·89 ± 0·93 bc
NMR LN T2 45·28 ± 1·26 g 25·20 ± 0·91 g 31·14 ± 0·89 h 57·88 ± 1·40 d
NMR HN T1 45·05 ± 0·95 g 22·24 ± 0·90 ef 28·22 ± 0·70 fg 52·61 ± 1·54 abc
NMR HN T2 47·82 ± 0·87 h 25·06 ± 0·75 g 29·46 ± 1·36 gh 53·91 ± 1·45 bc
(b) Variable value = P concentration (mg g−1 dry matter)
Factors
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
A
B
C
Leaf P
Tukey-t
Stem P
Tukey-t
Root P
Tukey-t
Nodule P
Tukey-t
N LN T1 1·59 ± 0·06 a 1·42 ± 0·07 a 1·69 ± 0·04 a
N LN T2 1·60 ± 0·04 a 1·41 ± 0·04 a 1·68 ± 0·07 a
N HN T1 1·71 ± 0·04 ab 1·55 ± 0·08 abc 1·73 ± 0·04 a
N HN T2 1·72 ± 0·05 ab 1·54 ± 0·12 abc 1·73 ± 0·08 a
NM LN T1 2·23 ± 0·05 de 2·11 ± 0·09 gh 2·20 ± 0·09 cd
NM LN T2 2·65 ± 0·09 gh 2·67 ± 0·10 i 2·79 ± 0·10 f
NM HN T1 2·05 ± 0·12 cd 1·84 ± 0·06 def 2·17 ± 0·09 cd
NM HN T2 2·33 ± 0·10 ef 1·97 ± 0·05 efg 2·24 ± 0·10 d
NR LN T1 1·79 ± 0·05 ab 1·54 ± 0·08 abc 1·81 ± 0·04 ab 3·84 ± 0·09 b
NR LN T2 2·08 ± 0·09 d 1·66 ± 0·06 bcd 1·99 ± 0·05 bc 4·49 ± 0·23 c
NR HN T1 1·77 ± 0·08 ab 1·67 ± 0·05 bcd 1·78 ± 0·07 a 3·04 ± 0·15 a
NR HN T2 1·86 ± 0·06 bc 1·77 ± 0·03 cde 1·79 ± 0·05 ab 3·85 ± 0·21 b
NMR LN T1 2·45 ± 0·13 efg 2·35 ± 0·12 h 2·45 ± 0·09 e 4·91 ± 0·09 cd
NMR LN T2 2·87 ± 0·07 h 2·93 ± 0·14 j 2·93 ± 0·05 f 5·25 ± 0·09 d
NMR HN T1 2·28 ± 0·06 de 2·06 ± 0·11 fg 2·24 ± 0·60 d 3·68 ± 0·15 b
NMR HN T2 2·51 ± 0·07 fg 2·15 ± 0·08 gh 2·34 ± 0·10 de 4·73 ± 0·26 c

Values are means ± s.e, n = 8.

Different letters indicate significant differences assessed by Tukey HSD test (P < 0·05) after performing three-way ANOVA with residual estimation.