Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;93(3):323–332. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch039

Table 3.

Summary of genetic variation for five loci in eight populations of Thymus loscosii

Population N P A* H o H e F
ULL 30·2 80·0 2·83 0·491 (0·279) 0·402 (0·226) –0·222
ALB 32·6 80·0 3·33 0·497 (0·249) 0·407 (0·189) –0·221
LGR 29·0 100 2·83 0·469 (0·239) 0·479 (0·038) 0·022
VAL 31·4 80·0 3·17 0·439 (0·246) 0·418 (0·222) –0·051
MON 31·4 80·0 3·00 0·470 (0·281) 0·425 (0·242) –0·104
LPE 29·6 80·0 2·50 0·479 (0·270) 0·408 (0·232) –0·175
CHI 31·2 80·0 3·00 0·452 (0·266) 0·399 (0·223) –0·132
ELC 30·6 100 3·33 0·476 (0·246) 0·438 (0·178) –0·086
Mean 30·7 85·0 3·00 0·472 0·422
s.d. 9·2 0·28 0·019 0·026

N, sample size; P, percentage of polymorphic loci; A, mean number of alleles per locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected panmictic heterozygosity; F, mean fixation index.

Standard deviation in parentheses.

* Locus Aco‐1 is included in its calculation.