Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 5;94(6):811–817. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch208

Table 1.

Details of the irrigated rice crops

Cultivar
Year
Actual yield (t ha−1)
Predicted potential yield (t ha−1)
Transplanting date
Panicle initiation (DAT)
Crop Duration (days)
Remarks
IR72 1997 11·6 ± 0·7 11·4 27 Jan. 43 102 El Niño year (Sheehy et al., 2000)
1998 11·6 ± 0·3 10·6 28 Dec. 39 101 Dry year (Sheehy et al., 2000)
1999 8·1 ± 0·2 8·9 4 Jan. 38 105 Average year (Sheehy et al., 2001)
2000 7·6 ± 0·1 9·1 10 Jan. 42 107 Unusually wet year (unpubl. data)
2001 7·8 ± 0·1 8·8 5 Jan. 40 101 Average year (Sheehy et al., 2004b)
NPT
    (IR65598-112-2) 1997 11·6 ± 0·5 11·4 27 Jan. 56 116 El Niño year (Sheehy et al., 2000)
    (IR65564-44-5-1) 1998 12·0 ± 0·3 10·6 28 Dec. 46 108 Dry year (Sheehy et al., 2000)
    (IR68011-15-1-1) 1999 7·0 ± 0·2 8·9 4 Jan. 53 114 Average year (Sheehy et al., 2001)

Yields are given at 14 % moisture content (86 % dry matter).

El Niño years in the Philippines are exceptionally sunny and dry.

Potential predicted yield is from the model given in Sheehy et al. (2004c).