Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul;94(1):33–41. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch108

Table 1.

Pollen viability and results of fruit set (%) in 11 species of neotropical Malpighiaceae from a semi‐deciduous forest in south‐eastern Brazil, after emasculation, and self‐, cross‐ and open pollinations

Pollen Compatibility Self‐pollination Cross‐ Open pollination
Species n viability (%) system Emasculation spontaneous hand pollination (control)
Banisteriopsis adenopoda 6 89 SC 0 (0/63) 2·5 (4/159) 24·5 (42/171) 16·7 (25/150) 8·9 (20/225)
B. lutea 3 57 SC 0 (0/87) 5·5 (2/36) 1·8 (1/54)
B. muricata 3 84 SC 0 (0/66) 1·7 (2/117) 38·0 (16/42) 2·7 (3/108)
B. pubipetala 1 22 AG 42·5 (51/120) 18·0 (26/144)
Dicella bracteosa 12 85 SI 0 (0/42) 0 (0/45) 5·2 (2/38) 0 (0/41)
Mascagnia anisopetala 10 87 SC 1·7 (2/117) 0·7 (2/261) 3·3 (6/183) 4·0 (8/198)
M. cordifolia 8 77 SI 0 (0/36) 42·8 (18/42) 0 (0/57)
M. sepium 6 73 SI 0 (0/36) 0 (0/9) 11·7 (6/51)
Stigmaphyllon lalandianum 14 91 SI 0 (0/45) 0 (0/117) 7·6 (8/105) 4·9 (8/162)
Tetrapterys guilleminiana 5 74 SC 0 (0/90) 13·0 (9/69) 5·2 (3/57) 3·3 (4/120)
T. phlomoides 1 87 SC 0 (0/60) 12·9 (17/132) 5·9 (96/102

Figures in parentheses indicate the number of samaras matured/carpels (fruits/functional carpels for Dicella bracteosa) used in each treatment.

n = number of individuals per species; SC = self‐compatible, SI = self‐incompatible, AG = agamospermous.