Table 3.
Genetic variability within populations of Cycas guizhouensis, as revealed by the ISSR analysis. N, sample size; P, percentage of polymorphic loci; HE, expected heterozygosity; HO, Shannon’s diversity index
| Population | N | P | HE (s.d.) | HO (s.d.) |
| JS | 20 | 20·51 | 0·0884 (0·1796) | 0·1270 (0·2579) |
| KY | 16 | 15·38 | 0·0668 (0·1595) | 0·0961 (0·2282) |
| LL | 20 | 14·10 | 0·0551 (0·1426) | 0·0807 (0·2064) |
| LP | 22 | 15·38 | 0·0720 (0·1704) | 0·1016 (0·2402) |
| LX | 16 | 11·54 | 0·0500 (0·1405) | 0·0719 (0·2014) |
| ML | 20 | 16·67 | 0·0698 (0·1588) | 0·1013 (0·2295) |
| MZ | 22 | 15·38 | 0·0637 (0·1524) | 0·0928 (0·2206) |
| SZ | 6 | 8·97 | 0·0366 (0·1217) | 0·0531 (0·1744) |
| TX | 19 | 16·67 | 0·0687 (0·1577) | 0·1000 (0·2276) |
| WF | 14 | 10·26 | 0·0426 (0·1298) | 0·0619 (0·1865) |
| XY | 20 | 11·54 | 0·0492 (0·1396) | 0·0710 (0·1999) |
| YP | 20 | 14·10 | 0·0531 (0·1366) | 0·0789 (0·2002) |
| Mean (s.d.) | 14·21 (3·21) | 0·0597 (0·0145) | 0·0864 (0·0206) |