Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;14:663. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-663

Table 4.

Comparison of relationship between Histological grading and prognositic factors

Histological grading P
Variables H1 (≤2) H2 (2–3) H3 (3–4) H4 (4–5)
Size <0.001
  ≤4 cm 61 39 117 7
  >4 cm 153 143 375 37
Location
  Lower 150 130 358 35
  Middle 34 25 76 6
  Upper 30 27 58 3
  Entire
Macroscopic Type <0.001
  Early stage 31 18 49 2
  Borrmann I 10 2 7 1
  Borrmann II 43 33 63 6
  Borrmann III 127 123 334 30
  Borrmann IV 3 6 38 5
Lauren grade <0.001
  Intestinal 169 127 194 6
  Diffuse 45 55 298 38
Histologic type <0.001
  Differentiated 164 141 72 3
  Un-differentiated 50 41 420 41
Depth of tumor <0.001
  T1 30 17 42 1
  T2 46 36 95 8
  T3 92 89 223 14
  T4 46 40 132 21
Node metastasis <0.001
  N0 87 55 137 9
  N1 42 37 83 6
  N2 44 40 96 9
  N3 41 50 176 20
Lymphovascular invasion <0.001
  Negative 145 104 240 10
  Positive 77 76 249 35
Peritoneal metastasis
  Absent 889
  Present 43
Hepatic metastasis
  Absent 878
  Present 54