Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec 27;115(7):1209–1215.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.032

Table 4.

Description of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Analyzed

rs No. Gene Region Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change (If Applicable) Physical Location (Base Pairs) MAF (Unaffected) Frequency in Affected
1045216 PLEKHA1 Exon 12 G>A Thr320Ala 124179187 A = 0.291 A = 0.254
10490923 LOC387715/ARMS2 Exon 1 G>A Arg3His 124204241 A = 0.108 A = 0.060
2736911 LOC387715/ARMS2 Exon 1 T>C Arg38End 124204345 C = 0.097 C = 0.086
10490924 LOC387715/ARMS2 Exon 1 G>T Ala69Ser 124204438 T = 0.328 T = 0.526
10664316 LOC387715/ARMS2 Intron 1 del AT 124206375^124206376 − = 0.414 −= 0.269
7088128 LOC387715/ARMS2 Intron 1 A>G 124206400 G = 0.119 G = 0.067
11200638* HTRA1 Promoter G>A 124210534 A = 0.317 A = 0.522
HTRA1 Promoter G>A 124210557 A = 0.022 A = 0.015
HTRA1 Promoter C>T 124210657 T = 0.060 T = 0.049
2672598 HTRA1 Promoter C>T 124210672 T = 0.496 T = 0.321
1049331 HTRA1 Exon 1 C>T Ala34Ala 124211260 T = 0.317 T = 0.526
2293870 HTRA1 Exon 1 G>C Gly36Gly 124211266 C = 0.090 C = 0.086
G>T Gly36Gly 124211266 T = 0.317 T = 0.522
12267142* HTRA1 Intron 1 C>G 124238232 G = 0.022 G = 0.022
2239586 HTRA1 Intron 3 C>T 124239225 T = 0.108 T = 0.078
2239587 HTRA1 Intron 3 G>A 124239299 A = 0.116 A = 0.086
2672582 HTRA1 Intron 4 C>T 124256490 T = 0.429 T = 0.507
HTRA1 Intron 5 del GTTT 124256973^124256976 −= 0.392 −= 0.351
2672583 HTRA1 Intron 5 G>A 124257077 A = 0.422 A = 0.515
3013206* HTRA1 Intron 5 A>T 124257163 T = 0.045 T = 0.022
2672585 HTRA1 Intron 6 C>G 124258391 G = 0.425 G = 0.507
11538140* HTRA1 Exon 8 C>T Asp407Asp 124261518 T = 0.004 T = 0.004
2272599 HTRA1 Intron 8 A>G 124261585 G = 0.474 G= 0.545
2293871 HTRA1 Intron 8 C>T 124263661 T = 0.138 T = 0.101

MAF = minor allele frequency.

The physical location of each SNP was determined using Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/index.html).

*

Variants/SNPs excluded from statistical analysis because MAF did not meet the criteria of ≥5% in both affected and unaffected siblings combined.

The most minor of the 3 alleles