Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2013 Feb 28;18(5):543–562. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.743629

TABLE 3.

Perceived Utility of the Project 3 Callback Intervention Reported at Two Months Follow-Up

%
Discussed questions/concerns about breast cancer (% yes) 66.11
How much information looking for did you actually receive:
   All/most 61.52
   Some 21.8
   Little/None 16.7
Increased knowledge (% agree) 76.92
Increased confidence (% agree) 75.02
Helped adjust to life post-treatment (% agree) 71.82
Recommend continuing as usual service program (% agree) 91.72
Among those who recommended callbacks:
   Recommended 1 callback 40.63
   Recommended 2+ callbacks 54.5
   Don’t know 4.9
1

Denominator = Group 3 participants (n=262) who reported receiving callback intervention (n=236 or 90%)

2

Denominator = Group 3 participants who reported discussing breast cancer questions/concerns (n=156)

3

Denominator = Group 3 participants who recommended continuing callback as service program (n=143)