Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;4(21):4080–4092. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1262

Table 2.

Partitioning of the variance in sperm morphometric and dynamic traits into: variance between species, among males of a single species, and within males

Source of variance
Between species Among males Within male Total Repeatability T. merianae Measurement error T. merianae Repeatability T. rufescens Measurement error T. rufescens
Head length
 Variance estimate ± SD 0.048 ± 0.221 0.735 ± 0.857 1.092 ± 1.045 1.875 0.97 0.06 0.97 0.05
Midpiece length
 Variance estimate ± SD 0.0269 ± 0.164 0.100 ± 0.316 0.297 ± 0.545 0.424 0.84 0.05 0.75 0.04
Flagellum length
 Variance estimate ± SD 2.582 ± 1.607 1.235 ± 1.111 12.163 ± 3.487 15.98 0.96 0.2 0.98 0.13
Total length
 Variance estimate ± SD 4.123 ± 2.030 1.755 ± 1.325 13.782 ± 3.712 19.66 0.97 0.23 0.99 0.14
VCL
 Variance estimate ± SD 4.309 ± 2.076 46.442 ± 6.815 53.01 ± 7.281 103.761 0.97 1.6 0.96 1.64
VSL
 Variance estimate ± SD 2.726 ± 1.651 34.473 ± 5.871 74.078 ± 8.607 111.269 0.99 0.61 0.99 0.68
LIN
 Variance estimate ± SD 0 ± 0 0.0014 ± 0.038 0.021 ± 0.1436 0.0224 0.97 0.00082 0.92 0.0011

The variance due to measurement errors was obtained using 15 males of each species; five spermatozoa of each male were measured four times. All morphometric and dynamic traits showed high and significant measurement repeatability (Sperm morphometric traits: T. merianae all F74, 300 > 24.47, P < 0.0001; T. rufescens all F74, 300 > 13.32, P < 0.0001; sperm dynamic traits: T. merianae all F74, 300 > 119, P < 0.0001; T. rufescens all F74, 300 > 46.14, P < 0.0001).