Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 20;7:385–395. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S73079

Table 1.

Comparison of regulatory frameworks for Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar

GCC state Basis of regulation Regulatory body Classification system used Post-market surveillance requirements Need for local representative
Saudi Arabia Pre-existing approval in one of GHTF founding member countries SFDA According to pre-existing approval agency Required to maintain a database of safety and performance data; Mechanism for corrective actions as necessary Yes
UAE Based on guideline from RDC; similar to EU but absolute requirement for both safety and effectiveness data RDC under Ministry of Health Own system, similar to EU: Class I=low risk, Class II=medium risk, non-implantable, Class III=medium risk, implantable, Class IV=high risk Required to maintain a Medical Device Vigilance System database; Mechanism for corrective actions as necessary Yes
Qatar Pre-existing approval in one of GHTF founding member countries Currently under MEC; Plans to change to Department of Pharmacy and Drug Control (SCH) According to pre-existing approval agency Not specified Yes

Abbreviations: GHTF, Global Harmonization Task Force; SFDA, Saudi Food and Drug Administration; RDC, Registration and Drug Control Department; MEC, Ministry of Economy and Commerce; SCH, Supreme Council of Health; UAE, United Arab Emirates; GCC, Gulf Cooperation Council; EU, European Union.