Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2014 May 24;125:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.023

Table 2.

Estimated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of lifetime drinking using fixed effect logistic regression model (N = 1707).

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Age 1.51** (0.22) 1.48** (0.22) 1.47* (0.22)
Female 1.36 (0.16) 1.31* (0.16) 1.29* (0.16)
Hispanic/Latino 2.41*** (0.38) 2.26*** (0.37) 2.28*** (0.37)
Academic grades 0.63*** (0.05) 0.64*** (0.05) 0.64*** (0.05)
Receipt of free
  or reduced-cost lunch
1.19 (0.22) 1.20 (0.22) 1.21 (0.22)
Ratio of rooms to people
  in a household
1.10 (0.11) 1.10 (0.11) 1.09 (0.11)
Parental drinking 2.13*** (0.26) 2.13*** (0.27) 2.13*** (0.27)
Number of friendship
  nominations
0.96* (0.02) 0.99 (0.02) 0.99 (0.02)
Number of popularity
  nominations
0.99 (0.03) 1.01 (0.04) 0.96 (0.04)
Popularity
  Indegree based
  on friendship
1.15 (0.09) 1.16 (0.10) 1.16 (0.10)
  Indegree based
  on popularity
1.37*** (0.11) 1.34*** (0.11) 1.35*** (0.11)
Network exposure
  Friends' drinking 1.88** (0.36) 1.07 (0.53) 0.91 (0.46)
  Popular friends'
  drinking
2.23 (1.36) 2.55 (1.59)
  Non-popular friends'
  drinking
3.51* (1.84) 3.89* (2.06)
  Multiplex congruity
  (popular friends
  rank order)
3.10* (1.44)

Note.

p < 0.1;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001 for two-tailed test. Parentheses show standard errors. All models include four dummy school identifiers. A set of dummy variables indicating zero exposure terms was controlled for in the decomposed exposure terms (not included in the table).