Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 12;29(12):1672–1678. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2982-y

Table 3.

Adjusted Patient Outcomes on the Relative Score- 30-day Readmission, LOS, Cost Difference in Index Hospitalization, Cumulative Cost Difference (Index Encounter Plus Readmissions Within 30 days)

Outcome Academic-preceptor vs. hospitalist-alone Hospitalist-preceptor vs. hospitalist-alone Academic-preceptor vs. hospitalist-preceptor
30-Day readmission
 Odds ratio 1.14 1.10 1.03
 95 % CI (1.03, 1.26) (1.002, 1.21) (0.93, 1.14)
p value 0.014 0.046 0.55
Length of stay*
 Difference in days −0.27 −0.34 0.07
 95 % CI (−0.36, −0.18) (−0.42, −0.26) (−0.01, 0.16)
p value <0.001 <0.001 0.10
Index hospitalization cost*
 Cost difference (US $) −386 −570 192
 95 % CI (−576, −192) (−760, −378) (−8, 393)
p value <0.001 <0.001 0.060
Cumulative hospital cost within 30 days*
 Cost difference (US $) 253 −1,347 1,728
 95 % CI (−861, 1,435) (−2,816, 254) (526, 3,002)
p value 0.66 0.097 0.0043

The reference group is hospitalist-alone service. Estimates from GEE are reported on the original scale and adjusted for age, gender, sum of comorbidity categories, MS-DRG weight, ICU admission, weekend admission, weekend discharge, payer category and a clustering effect for repeated patient and provider encounters. Cumulative cost was defined as the index encounter plus readmissions within 30 days of discharge. All p values reported are for these adjusted analyses

*We included a smearing estimator to correct for retransformation bias. Unadjusted outcomes are reported in the online Appendix, Table A3