Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Women Q. 2014 Jun;38(2):222–232. doi: 10.1177/0361684313501999

Table 4. Results of Logistic Regression Analysis Predicting Rape Victims' Consultation with Someone about Reporting to Police (N =435).

Non-Consulting Consulting Univariate Final Model

Predictors % % OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age (M(SD) 44.69(15.83) 33.83(9.90) F=31.26*** 0.95*** 0.92-0.97
Age at rape (M(SD) 22.36 (8.65) 20.18(6.34) F = 3.99* 1.00 0.96-1.05
Injury 43 57 1.74* 1.04-2.90 1.55 0.84-2.83
Peri-traumatic fear 50 63 1.64 0.96-2.80
Forcible rape 85 87 1.16 0.55-2.45
DAFR/IR 28 35 1.39 0.81-2.38
Stranger perpetrator 11 14 1.31 0.63-2.74
Acknowledged as rape 62 80 2.37** 1.28-4.39 2.35* 1.16-4.79
Multiple rape history 48 51 1.11 0.67-1.85
STD concerns 37 57 2.25** 1.34-3.76 0.95 0.52-1.76
HIV concerns 35 49 1.72* 1.02-2.88
Concerned family finding out 53 64 1.60 0.94-2.72
Concerned non-family finding out 47 76 3.63*** 2.02-6.53 2.34* 1.17-4.67
Concerned blame from others 56 69 1.72* 1.00-2.97 0.96 0.49-1.86
Pregnancy concerns 46 50 1.17 0.70-1.94

Note. Reference group is non-consulting women. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; FR = forcible rape; DAFR/IR = drug- and alcohol-facilitated and incapacitated rape.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001