Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2014 Oct 1;3(4):394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.06.002

Table 1.

Prevalence of Tourette Syndrome in the Pediatric Population in Studies Conducted between 2000-2012

Author/
Year
N Age Country Source of
Sample
Diagnostic
Assessment
Diagnostic
Criteria
# of
cases
Prevalence
(per 1000)
95% CI
(per
1000)a
Kadesjo & Gillberg, 2000 435 10-11 Sweden Birth cohort In person interview with parent, child & teacher DSM-IV 5 11 4-27
Kurlan et al., 2001 1255 8.5-17.5 United States Randomly Selected Schools In person structured interview with parent & child DSM-IVb 48 38c 28.5 – 49.9b,c
Peterson et al., 2001 776 9-20 United State Community cohort In person structured interview with parent & child DSM-III 2 2.6 0-6.2
Hornsey et al., 2001 918 13-14 England Six Schools – single mainstream class In person structured interview with parent & child DSM-III-R 7 7.6 2-13.2
Khalifa & von Knorring, 2003 4479 7-15 Sweden Community; all available in township In person structured interview with parent & child DSM-IV 25 5.6 3.4-7.7
Wang & Kuo, 2003 2000 6-12 Taiwan School In person structured interview with parent & child Tourette Syndrome Study Group 11 5.5 2.3-8.7
Jin et al., 2005 9742 7-16 China Community In person interview parent& child Chinese Diagnostic Standard for Psychiatric Disorders (3rd edition) 42 4.3 3.0-5.6
Scahill et al., 2006 e 910 6-12 United State Community In person structured parent interview DSM-IV 3 3.3 0 –7
Stefanoff et al., 2008 1579 12-15 Poland School In person interview parent & child ICD-10 9 5.7 2.0-9.4
Cubo et al., 2011 741 5-17 Spain Regional community sample Semi-structured interview via telephone DSM-IV 27 36.4 22.9-49.8b,d
Kraft et al. (2012) 5974 9-15 Denmark Birth cohort Structured parent interview via telephone DSM-IV 33 5.5 3.7-7.3
a

= Calculated from reported prevalence data and sample size 95% CI = estimate ± 1.96 X square root of pq/n (where p=prevalence, q=1-p, n= sample size)

b

= did not use the “impairment” criterion

c

=Regular Education classes, and additional 24 cases were identified from Special Education classes

d

= Regular Education classes, and additional 7 cases were identified from Special Education classes

e

=screening was for behavioral problems, not tics specifically

A similar table appeared in Tourette Syndrome, D. Martino and JF Leckman (eds); Oxford, New York, 2013