Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 31;12:122. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5

Table 2.

Site-level characteristics at baseline and follow-up

Site-level characteristics Baseline Follow-up
intervention mean a (range) Control mean a (range) intervention mean a (range) Control mean a (range)
Number of sites 4 4 4 4
Number of CAs per site two sites with 8 (4 female, 4 male) two sites with 8 (4 female, 4 male) two sites with 8 (4 female, 4 male); two sites with 8 (4 female, 4 male);
two sites with 16 (8 female, 8 male) two sites with 16 (8 female, 8 male) two sites with 16 (8 female, 8 male) two sites with 16 (8 female, 8 male)
Number of households per site (in sampling frame) 1,866 (852 to 2,648) 1,367 (974 to 1,829) 3,190 (1,866 to 4,465) 1,811 (1,444 to 2,526)
% of households with electricity 74 (65 to 80) 79 (67 to 89) 85 (82 to 89) 85 (83 to 86)
% of households where main drinking water source is a public tap 63 (52 to 80) 68 (57 to 80) 65 (42 to 80) 64 (53 to 80)
% of households using traditional pit toilet/latrine 63 (57 to 74) 60 (55 to 64) 57 (49 to 67) 54 (45 to 61)
% of households living in rented accommodation 65 (47 to 79) 71 (59 to 82) 76 (68 to 86) 72 (64 to 82)
% belonging to Baganda Tribe 72 (64 to 77) 65 (35 to 80) 66 (57 to 71) 62 (38 to 78)
% belonging to main religions
Catholic 36 (29 to 40) 36 (30 to 43) 37 (34 to 38) 36 (31 to 40)
Muslim 25 (21 to 31) 26 (21 to 32) 24 (19 to 29) 22 (16 to 29)
Protestant 23 (17 to 31) 24 (22 to 25) 25 (18 to 29) 26 (25 to 29)
Born Again 13 (10 to 17) 10 (9 to 13) 13 (10 to 16) 13 (10 to 19)

aUnweighted mean of site-level summary data.