Table 1.
No relationship between syllable duration and inter-syllable frequency ratios
| Subject | Spontaneous singing | Reactive singing | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rho | P | rho | P | |
| 1 | -0.08 | 0.35 | -0.16 | 0.04 |
| 2 | -0.06 | 0.52 | -0.14 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| 4 | -0.10 | 0.32 | -0.10 | 0.29 |
| 5 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| 6 | -0.02 | 0.82 | -0.14 | 0.13 |
| 7 | -0.01 | 0.93 | 0.01 | 0.91 |
| 8 | -0.17 | 0.11 | -0.05 | 0.56 |
| 9 | -0.13 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.54 |
| 10 | -0.09 | 0.33 | -0.19 | 0.08 |
| 11 | -0.001 | 0.99 | 0.08 | 0.42 |
| 12 | 0.03 | 0.70 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| 13 | -0.08 | 0.51 | 0.003 | 0.98 |
| 14 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.35 |
| 15 | -0.06 | 0.56 | -0.04 | 0.63 |
| 16 | -0.11 | 0.24 | -0.15 | 0.10 |
Spearman’s rank rho is given for correlations between syllable duration and inter-syllable frequency ratios of each of the 16 subjects in spontaneous and reactive singing. Tests are based on mean values per syllable type. Significant P-values are given in bold.