Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;25(12):2927–2941. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013091009

Table 1.

Details of dataset for each of the three groups—SABX, ABL, and GWX

Study Study Period No. of CRB Type of Study/Approach Patient Characteristics Definition of Cure Follow-Up (d) Cure (%) Recurrence with Same Organism (%) Complications Notes
SABX
 Moss et al. 19907 United States 1984–1988 16 Retrospective chart review/systemic antibiotics alone Not available for study subjects. 50% diabetic. Incident catheters Clearance and lack of recurrent bacteremia 28 4 (25) None
 Swartz et al. 19948 United States 1990–1993 29 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone Not available for study subjects. Incident catheters Clinical resolution in 48 h+CVC salvage ≥21 9 (31)
 Lund et al. 19969 United States 1991–1992 22 Retrospective chart review/systemic antibiotics alone Not available for study subjects. Incident catheters. Clinical resolution 180 7 (31.8)
 Marr et al. 199710 United States 1995–1996 38 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus CVC removal Median age=56 yr, 54% female. 38% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Original CVC present at 3 mo or removal for noninfectious reason 90 12 (31.6) 5 (no subgroup details) Persistent and recurrent bacteremia are in the same group—18
 Saad 199911 United States 1995–1997 25 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus GWX Mean age=52.2 yr. 63.3% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Lack of recurrence within 30 d 30 11 (36.7) 14 (56)
 Chawla and Nevins 200012 United States 1986–1995 18 Retrospective chart review/systemic antibiotics alone Mean age=12.5 yr, 20% female. No patients with diabetes. Prevalent catheters Clearance and CVC salvage 120 6 (33.3) 4 (22.2)
 Jean et al. 200213 France 1994–1998 56 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone Mean age=59.8 yr, 30% female. 33% diabetic. Incident catheters. Clinical resolution at 48 h and no recurrence 90 29 (51.8) 6 (3 shock/death, 1 spondylitis, 2 pneumonia)
 Lee et al. 200514 South Korea 2001–2005 11 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus ABL Mean age=56 yr, 64% female. 45.5% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 48 h and culture negative 1 wk after antibiotic completion 21–28 6 (54.6)
 Mokrzycki et al. 20063 United States 2000–2003 49 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus GWX versus CVC removal and replacement versus CVC removal with alternate access Mean age=55 yr, 44% female. 36% diabetic. Prevalent catheters No recurrence/death in 90 d 90 36 (73.5) 10 (20.4) 6 (no details) and 3 deaths
 Troidle and Finkelstein 200815 United States 2001–2006 35 Prospective observational study/removal versus GWX versus systemic antibiotics alone Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters No bacteremia/death in 60 d 60 21 (60) 5 (14.3) 8 deaths
 Ashby et al. 200916 United Kingdom 115 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus CVC removal Mean age=61.1 yr, 39% diabetic. Prevalent catheters No recurrence/complication in 6 mo 180 76 (66.1) 38 (33) 1 (no details) Systemic antibiotics for 6 wk
 Onder et al. 201317 United States 1997–1998 95 Retrospective chart review/systemic antibiotics alone Mean age=14.4 yr, 48% female. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 48 ho+CVC salvage at 4 wk 28 36 (37.9)
 Onder et al. 2013,17 2008,18 200719 United Statesa 1999–2003 188 Retrospective chart review/systemic antibiotics alone versus ABL Mean age=13.9 yr, 56% female. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 48 h and no recurrence 42 64 (34)
ABL
 Capdevila et al. 199320 Spain 1990–1991 11b Prospective observational study/ABL Mean age=62.6 yr, 82% female. Incident catheters. Clinical resolution 48–72 h+no recurrence within 6 wk 42 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) None ABL: vanc/hep and cipro/hep
 Bailey et al. 200221 United Kingdom 2000 10 Prospective observational study/ABL Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution+negative cultures at 2 and 4 wk 90 3 (30) 2 (20) 1 death vanc/hep, gent/hep, ampho B/hep
 Krishnasami et al. 200222 United States 2000 62 Prospective observational study/ABL versus historical catheter replacement control Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 48 h+negative cultures at 4 wk+CVC salvage 28 40 (64.5) 0 11 (5 septic shock, 2 septic arthritis, 3 IE, 1 OM) vanc/gent/hep, vanc/hep, gent/hep, cefaz/hep, cefaz/gent/hep
 Vardhan et al. 200223 United Kingdom 26 Observational study/ABL Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 72 h and negative cultures at 21 d 21 16 (61.5) 0 None vanc/gent/hep
 Poole et al. 200424 United States 2001–2002 47 Prospective interventional study/ABL versus historical control Mean age=54 yr, 62% female. 51% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution 48 h+negative cultures at 4 wk 28 33 (70.2) 5 (10.6) 3 (1 shock, 1 empyema, 1 infected thrombus) vanc/ceftaz/hep, vanc/hep, or ceftaz/hep
 Lee et al. 200514 South Korea 2001–2005 18 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus ABL Mean age=61.3 yr, 56% women. 93.7% diabetic. Prevalent catheters. Clinical resolution at 48 h and culture negative 1 wk after antibiotic completion 21–28 16 (88.9) vanc/hep, imi/hep, cipro/hep, ceftaz/hep
 Maya et al. 200725 United States 2002–2006 113 Retrospective review of prospective database/ABL (S. aureus bacteremia only) Mean age=52.3 yr, 55% women. 46.3% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution and no recurrence in 90 d 90 46 (40.7) 27 (23.9) 11 (5 IE, 2 OM, 1 septic arthritis, 1 shock, 1 infected thrombus, 1 chest wall abscess) vanc/hep and cefaz/hep
 Peterson et al. 200926 United States 2004–2007 64 Retrospective review of prospective database/ABL (VSE only) Mean age=54.5 yr, 64% female. 66% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Clinical resolution at 48 h and no recurrence 90 d 90 39 (60.9) 15 (23.4) 4 (1 IE, 3 OM) vanc/hep lock
 Onder et al. 2013,17 201025 United Statesa 2004–2006 149 Retrospective chart review/ABL Mean age=12.4 yr, 57% women. Prevalent catheters CRB clearance, CVC salvage, and no infection within 6 wk 42 80 (53.7) vanc/hep, vanc/TPA, tobra/hep, tobra/TPA
 Joshi and Hart 201225 United States 46 Prospective observational study/ABL Mean age=47 yr, 38% women. 50% diabetic. Prevalent catheters CRB clearance, CVC salvage, and no infection within 6 wk 21–35 27 (58.7) 0 1 IE various abx mixed with either hep or citrate (amikacin, ampho B, cefaz, cefaz + gent, ceftaz, gent, gent + vanc, vanc)
GWX
 Shaffer 199529 United States 1992–1994 12 Observational study/GWX Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters No bacteremia within 90 d 90 10 (83.3) None
 Robinson et al. 199830 United States 1996–1997 23 Prospective observational study/GWX Mean age=59 yr, 100% women. Percent diabetic not available. Prevalent catheters No bacteremia within 90 d 90 19 (82.6) 2 (8.7) 1 diskitis
 Saad 199911 United States 1995–1997 43 Prospective observational study/systemic abx alone versus GWX Mean age=52 yr. 58.1% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Lack of recurrence within 30 d 30 35 (81.4) 6 (14)
 Beathard 199931 United States 1996–1997 77 Prospective observational study/GWX versus delayed placement Mean age=53.8 yr. 48% patients with diabetes. Incident catheters. Lack of recurrence within 45 d 45 48 (62.3) 5 (6.5) None
 Tanriover et al. 200032 United States 1997–1998 31 Retrospective review of prospective database/GWX versus delayed placement Mean age=52 yr, 58% female. 35% diabetic. Prevalent catheters Infection-free survival ≥21 (up to 180) 15 (48.4) 7 (no details)
 Mokrzycki et al. 20063 United States 2000–2003 35 Prospective observational study/systemic antibiotics alone versus GWX versus CVC removal and replacement versus CVC removal with alternate access Mean age=57 yr, 54% female. 57% diabetic. Prevalent catheters. No recurrence/death in 90 d 90 34 (97.1) 1 (2.9) 1
 Troidle and Finkelstein 200815 United States 2001–2006 36 Prospective observational study/removal versus GWX versus systemic abx alone Not available for study subjects. Prevalent catheters No bacteremia/death in 60 d 60 21 (58.3) 1 (2.8) 8 deaths
 Langer et al. 201133 United States 2001–2008 96 Retrospective chart review/GWX in staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal bacteremiac Mean age=57.5 yr, 51% female. 52.5% diabetic. Prevalent catheters No bacteremia/death in the exchanged catheter ≥21 55 (57.3)

VSE, vancomycin sensitive enterococci; IE, infective endocarditis; OM, osteomyelitis; vanc, vancomycin; hep, heparin; cipro, ciprofloxacin; gent, gentamicin; ampho B, amphotericin B; cefaz, cefazolin; ceftaz, ceftazidime; imi, imipenem; TPA, tissue plasminogen activator; tobra, tobramycin.

a

Two or more publications contribute to each group, because the publications had overlapping information for the same patient populations. However, the years of patient enrollment are specific and distinguish the groups. There is no overlap of CRB cases between the Onder groups.

b

Study actually quotes data on 13 episodes of CRB. However, two of them are recurrences that occurred within the follow-up period of the initial episode and thus, have been counted as failures.

c

We grouped the staphylococcal and nonstaphylococcal infections into one group.