Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2013 Sep 10;126:192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.08.005

Table 6.

Results of linear mixed-effect models for personal exposure to dry-cleaning and Industrial-related VOCs.

Variable Group/unit TCE
PERC
CTC
β SE β SE β SE
Intercept 0.79 0.42 −0.48 0.49 0.64 0.23
Visit 1 0.18 0.07 0.19 0.10 −0.01 0.03
2 Reference Reference Reference
City Los Angeles 0.66 0.14 0.58 0.18 0.17 0.07
Elizabeth 1.23 0.14 0.54 0.24 −0.11 0.07
Houston Reference Reference Reference
Ambient relative humidity % 0.01 0.01
Ethnicity White −0.12 0.19
Mexican 0.48 0.23
Hispanic 0.06 0.24
Other Reference
Having a fireplace No 0.13 0.07
Indoor temperature °C 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01
Inverse wind speed knot−1 4.87 0.83
Log-transformed AER h−1 0.20 0.07
Not using fresheners or candles No 0.20 0.08
Restaurants or bakery in neighborhood No 0.26 0.13
Source of household water Public 0.58 0.27 0.50 0.14
Sweeping indoors No 0.19 0.12
Time spent at closed cars min 0.0018 0.0005
Unemployed No 0.42 0.13
Using air cleaning devices No 0.19 0.08
Vinyl, asbestos or other siding No 0.25 0.13
Visited dry cleaners during past week No 0.63 0.15

n = 400 to 446 depending on models.

AER, air exchange rate; TCE, trichloroethylene; PERC, tetrachloroethene; CTC, carbon tetrachloride.

For dichotomous variables, the reference group is “Yes”.

p-Value < 0.05 shown in bold type.