Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec;128(6):676–688. doi: 10.1037/bne0000018

Table 1.

Correlations of hippocampal-dependent and hippocampal-independent measures of performance during eyeblink conditioning and water maze testing in young and aged rats. Measures included the greatest % CRs emitted during any one session of trace conditioning (Trace) or delay conditioning (Delay), path length during the last three trials of visible platform training (Cued), path length during the last three sessions of hidden platform training (Hidden Platform), average proximity across the three probe tests (MWM Probe), and swim speed (Swim Speed). Asterisks indicate p<0.05.

Young
Trace MWM Probe Delay Hidden Platform Cued Platform Swim Speed
Trace −.328 .151 −.255 −.111 .222
MWM Probe −.328 −.240 .761* .067 −.203
Delay .151 −.240 −.137 .120 .591*
Hidden Platform −.255 .761* −.137 .425 −.293
Cued Platform −.111 .067 .120 .425 −.475
Swim Speed .222 −.203 .591* −.293 −.475
Aged
Trace MWM Probe Delay Hidden Platform Cued Platform Swim Speed
Trace .405* .503* −.060 −.067 .095
MWM Probe .405* −.273 .515* .250 −.253
Delay .503* −.273 .046 −.068 .058
Hidden Platform −.060 .515* .046 .095 −.219
Cued Platform −.067 .250 −.068 .095 −.291
Swim Speed .095 −.253 .058 −.219 −.291